文件操作 - {5492636A-AD7B-477C-8ACE-94CA811689E4}.eml
返回文件管理
返回主菜单
删除本文件
文件: /var/vmail/planetline.it/alberto/.Drafts/cur/{5492636A-AD7B-477C-8ACE-94CA811689E4}.eml
编辑文件内容
Return-Path: 9672-731-196293-2531-alberto=planetline.it@mail.sqribbmass.bid Received: from rush.sqribbmass.bid (mail.subwayslimners.com [104.206.117.40]) by mail.planetline.it with ESMTP ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:43:46 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=sqribbmass.bid; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=eBooks@sqribbmass.bid; bh=DGcOuBJKcQX5U3q0EnXasHDgz7E=; b=bYCIaZjjyFDfEFFOGPJUmUo/3q0wYWknMl966Yw++P6avMlymgSlPpYguurA2mcgCAPYcnIirX9D Yh6Ah4Hv6D4IKPScgFequp636q+JPHwuR+BZU1yv2ZbcBqB2Os6Vmqrcp4yzC5brXCruDyhD+4sA hNln8zMKQF6Eo1hsYQs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=sqribbmass.bid; b=miCJztxii3fRbVrQAs+okKL3vwQMdUGQ9vUvQdhqyqQHZtMbYliVHGZnzu01fcUHu1L5/80ySx9B Bum9TlMHFQDHmDRytHYOQSmrQa6mTUeFEL0X7QYOn/tDU04PeOFNZh0Sfu6YsI25tziPNPfI3Adm 1UmIfKYm4QHyZlu1JzM=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="819bba36835ecadc209c0c4f85af0b57_2db_2fec5" Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:40:27 -0400 From: "Sqribble" <eBooks@sqribbmass.bid> Reply-To: "eBooks" <Sqribble@sqribbmass.bid> Subject: [SPAM] Generate Ebooks On Demand With NEW Technology To: <alberto@planetline.it> Message-ID: <uugy211928k5bkve-4ezq1r3v76dsnrni-2db-2fec5@sqribbmass.bid> X-hMailServer-Spam: YES X-hMailServer-Reason-2: Rejected by dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net - (Score: 5) X-hMailServer-Reason-3: Rejected by rbldns.ru - (Score: 2) X-hMailServer-Reason-Score: 7 --819bba36835ecadc209c0c4f85af0b57_2db_2fec5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Generate Ebooks On Demand With NEW Technology http://sqribbmass.bid/9Uq1vqkW0ULovJRgN9zq8ySZC_zJmiusiaW4xl9h6RZN9ROa http://sqribbmass.bid/ZFjmk9ebFZMWbclF5-p9auEvzshCV5Sm487bQk9Ty4R-6K3C FTP normally transfers data by having the server connect back to the client, after the PORT command is sent by the client. This is problematic for both NATs and firewalls, which do not allow connections from the Internet towards internal hosts. For NATs, an additional complication is that the representation of the IP addresses and port number in the PORT command refer to the internal host's IP address and port, rather than the public IP address and port of the NAT. There are two approaches to solve this problem. One is that the FTP client and FTP server use the PASV command, which causes the data connection to be established from the FTP client to the server. This is widely used by modern FTP clients. Another approach is for the NAT to alter the values of the PORT command, using an application-level gateway for this purpose. Differences from HTTP HTTP essentially fixes the bugs in FTP that made it inconvenient to use for many small ephemeral transfers as are typical in web pages. FTP has a stateful control connection which maintains a current working directory and other flags, and each transfer requires a secondary connection through which the data are transferred. In "passive" mode this secondary connection is from client to server, whereas in the default "active" mode this connection is from server to client. This apparent role reversal when in active mode, and random port numbers for all transfers, is why firewalls and NAT gateways have such a hard time with FTP. HTTP is stateless and multiplexes control and data over a single connection from client to server on well-known port numbers, which trivially passes through NAT gateways and is simple for firewalls to manage. Setting up an FTP control connection is quite slow due to the round-trip delays of sending all of the required commands and awaiting responses, so it is customary to bring up a control connection and hold it open for multiple file transfers rather than drop and re-establish the session afresh each time. In contrast, HTTP originally dropped the connection after each transfer because doing so was so cheap. While HTTP has subsequently gained the ability to reuse the TCP connection for multiple transfers, the conceptual model is still of independent requests rather than a session. When FTP is transferring over the data connection, the control connection is idle. If the transfer takes too long, the firewall or NAT may decide that the control connection is dead and stop tracking it, effectively breaking the connection and confusing the download. The single HTTP connection is only idle between requests and it is normal and expected for such connections to be dropped after a time-out --819bba36835ecadc209c0c4f85af0b57_2db_2fec5 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <title>Newsletter</title> </head> <body><a href="http://sqribbmass.bid/9v2hzHTXN1QtGlG2ApLIyoxsdHeJ__kEtcipJysoy4QoLIYw"><img src="http://sqribbmass.bid/6bc38cdbaad6ae3123.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.sqribbmass.bid/WXXJQu80KboQsXQmyedimE27zIrV_hIHatkCz8jhMfz9-9uI" width="1" /></a> <div style="width:500; max-width:650px;font-family: sans-serif; padding:15px; font-size:17px; border:1px solid #EED7C8;"> <p style="color:#7E0017; font-size:20px;"><b>This is unbelievable…</b></p> <p><b>New revolutionary technology</b> has JUST been launched that allows you to INSTANTLY create professional Ebooks, Reports, Guides, Lead Magnets, Whitepapers, and digital info-products AUTOMATICALLY, and “ON-DEMAND”… at a push of a button!</p> <p><a href="http://sqribbmass.bid/9Uq1vqkW0ULovJRgN9zq8ySZC_zJmiusiaW4xl9h6RZN9ROa" style="color:#7E0017; font-size:20px;"><strong>Click here for Review</strong></a></p> <p>It’ll also add CONTENT for you! (Saving you time and $100’s or $1000’s in outsourcing costs.)</p> <p>Build your list faster, sell to your customers, or even to your clients as a service for $150 to $600, thanks to the “Commercial License” AND agency website that’s included as a bonus!</p> <p style="color:#7E0017; font-size:20px;"><b>You’ll get immediate access to:</b></p> <p>– ALL-IN-ONE One Sqribble Software<br /> – 50 Amazing Ebook Templates<br /> – 15 Niche Categories<br /> – 300 Page Layouts<br /> – Easy To Use Drag & Drop Editor<br /> – Instant Content Engine (“point-&-click”)<br /> – BONUS: Commercial License (Worth 497 *INCLUDED*)<br /> – BONUS: Agency Website (Worth 997 *INCLUDED*)<br /> <br /> ———————————</p> <p><a href="http://sqribbmass.bid/9Uq1vqkW0ULovJRgN9zq8ySZC_zJmiusiaW4xl9h6RZN9ROa"><strong>FULL DEMO:</strong></a></p> <p>———————————</p> <p>Kevin</p> <p><a href="http://sqribbmass.bid/9Uq1vqkW0ULovJRgN9zq8ySZC_zJmiusiaW4xl9h6RZN9ROa"><strong><i>PS.</i> SAVE 97% Today… (limited time ONLY):</strong></a></p> <br /> </div> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://sqribbmass.bid/W06bJKwUD8NMxj99I-hmHBJi29l7Dy2DhbypmM55dJjG15R2"><img src="http://sqribbmass.bid/1cb4f454fb8a6ec479.jpg" /></a> <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:6px;">FTP normally transfers data by having the server connect back to the client, after the PORT command is sent by the client. This is problematic for both NATs and firewalls, which do not allow connections from the Internet towards internal hosts. For NATs, an additional complication is that the representation of the IP addresses and port number in the PORT command refer to the internal host's IP address and port, rather than the public IP address and port of the NAT. There are two approaches to solve this problem. One is that the FTP client and FTP server use the PASV command, which causes the data connection to be established from the FTP client to the server. This is widely used by modern FTP clients. Another approach is for the NAT to alter the values of the PORT command, using an application-level gateway for this purpose. Differences from HTTP HTTP essentially fixes the bugs in FTP that made it inconvenient to use for many small ephemeral transfers as are typical in web pages. FTP has a stateful control connection which maintains a current working directory and other flags, and each transfer requires a secondary connection through which the data are transferred. In "passive" mode this secondary connection is from client to server, whereas in the default "active" mode this connection is from server to client. This apparent role reversal when in active mode, and random port numbers for all transfers, is why firewalls and NAT gateways have such a hard time with FTP. HTTP is stateless and multiplexes control and data over a single connection from client to server on well-known port numbers, which trivially passes through NAT gateways and is simple for firewalls to manage. Setting up an FTP control connection is quite slow due to the round-trip delays of sending all of the required commands and awaiting responses, so it is customary to bring up a control connection and hold it open for multiple file transfers rather than drop and re-establish the session afresh each time. In contrast, HTTP originally dropped the connection after each transfer because doing so was so cheap. While HTTP has subsequently gained the ability to reuse the TCP connection for multiple transfers, the conceptual model is still of independent requests rather than a session. When FTP is transferring over the data connection, the control connection is idle. If the transfer takes too long, the firewall or NAT may decide that the control connection is dead and stop tracking it, effectively breaking the connection and confusing the download. The single HTTP connection is only idle between requests and it is normal and expected for such connections to be dropped after a time-out</span></body> </html> --819bba36835ecadc209c0c4f85af0b57_2db_2fec5--
修改文件时间
将文件时间修改为当前时间的前一年
删除文件