文件操作 - color-why-calibrate.page
返回文件管理
返回主菜单
删除本文件
文件: /usr/share/help/ro/gnome-help/color-why-calibrate.page
编辑文件内容
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <page xmlns="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/" xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" type="topic" style="question" id="color-why-calibrate" xml:lang="ro"> <info> <link type="guide" xref="color#calibration"/> <desc>Calibrating is important if you care about the colors you display or print.</desc> <credit type="author"> <name>Richard Hughes</name> <email>richard@hughsie.com</email> </credit> <include xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" href="legal.xml"/> <mal:credit xmlns:mal="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/" type="translator copyright"> <mal:name>Daniel Șerbănescu</mal:name> <mal:email>daniel [at] serbanescu [dot] dk</mal:email> <mal:years>2016</mal:years> </mal:credit> </info> <title>Why do I need to do calibration myself?</title> <p> Generic profiles are usually bad. When a manufacturer creates a new model, they just take a few items from the production line and average them together: </p> <media its:translate="no" type="image" src="figures/color-average.png"> <p its:translate="yes">Averaged profiles</p> </media> <p> Display panels differ quite a lot from unit to unit and change substantially as the display ages. It is also more difficult for printers, as just changing the type or weight of paper can invalidate the characterization state and make the profile inaccurate. </p> <p> The best way of ensuring the profile you have is accurate is by doing the calibration yourself, or by letting an external company supply you with a profile based on your exact characterization state. </p> </page>
修改文件时间
将文件时间修改为当前时间的前一年
删除文件